Rivera v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
903 F.3d 147 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on MONREAL · Lattab v. Ashcroft · American Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh · Pulisir v. Mukasey · Amouri v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[a] bare allegation of either a constitutional shortfall or legal error' will not suffice,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gyamfi v. Whitaker“any judgment regarding the granting of relief under [ 8 U.S.C. § 1229b ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Perez v. Barr“'claim of constitutional or legal error must at least be colorable .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Perez v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.