Pruitt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Batson v. Kentucky · Blakely v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellate counsel's performance, as to the selection and presentation of issues, will ... be presumed adequate unless found unquestionably unreasonable considering the information available in the trial record or otherwise known to appellate counsel. To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a defendant must therefore show from the information available in the trial record or otherwise known to appellate counsel that appellate counsel failed to present a significant and obvious issue and that this failure cannot be explained by any reasonable strategy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Ward v. State“an individual who, before becoming twenty-two (22) years of age, manifests: (1) significantly subaverage intellectual functioning; and (2) substantial impairment of adaptive behavior.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Witt v. State“unless the judge holds a personal bias or prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Shackleford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.