Weiss v. Glemp’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Roberts v. Dudley (2000), Sheldon v. Fettig (1996)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of Marin · 58 Cal. 2d 23 - Stasher v. Harger-Haldeman · 121 Wash. 2d 552 - Hanson v. City of Snohomish · 117 Wash. 2d 148 - Wichert v. Cardwell · 116 Wash. 2d 923 - City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(15) In all other cases, to the defendant personally, or by leaving a copy of the summons at the house of his or her usual abode with some person of suitable age and discretion then resident therein. (16) In lieu of service under subsection (15) of this section, where the person cannot with reasonable diligence be served as described, the summons may be served as provided in this subsection, and shall be deemed complete on the tenth day after the required mailing: By leaving a copy at his or her usual mailing address with a person of suitable age and discretion who is a resident, proprietor, or agent thereof, and by thereafter mailing a copy by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the person to be served at his or her usual mailing address. For the purposes of this subsection, "usual mailing address" shall not include a United States postal service post office box or the person's place of employment.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Clark · State v. Clark“[B]eyond due process [requirements], statutory service requirements must be complied with in order the for the court to finally adjudicate the dispute between the parties.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Sheldon v. Fettig · Salts v. Estes“approach. There, Weiss argued windowsill service was constitutionally adequate, since it was reasonably calculated to provide notice to the defendant. In rejecting Weiss's argument, we said,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.