Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 903 SO2D 1001 - State v. Hall

State v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Naveira · 426 So. 2d 46 - State v. Fraser · 496 So. 2d 130 - State v. Bivona · 688 So. 2d 1012 - State v. Gantt · State v. Gilliam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “which triggers a requirement set forth in rule 3.191(p)(3) that the court hold a hearing on the notice within five days. Unless the court finds that one of the reasons enumerated in subdivision (i) exists to support a determination that the speedy trial period has not expired, rule 3.191(p)(3) provides that the court must”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A defendant not brought to trial within the 10-day period through no fault of the defendant, on motion of the defendant or the court, shall be forever discharged from the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “order that the defendant be brought to trial within 10 days.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.