Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

903 So. 2d 256

McQueen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-05-20

Relies on Arnold v. State · 884 So. 2d 950 - Richardson v. State · 862 So. 2d 807 - McCall v. State

Decided 2005-05-20

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed. See Burrows v. State, 890 So.2d 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); O’Neal v. State, 862 So.2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Arnold v. State, 566 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); LaMar v. State, 823 So.2d 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). As this court did in McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), review granted, No. SC04-174, 898 So.2d 81, 2005 WL 937726 (Fla. Apr. 1, 2005).

¶2Affirmed; conflict certified.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and SALCINES and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.
/903/so2d/256 · .json · Public domain