Luma v. State

¶1Affirmed. See Forcelledo v. State, 898 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)(“The State *303is allowed to give notice under as many classifications as it chooses, where the State is prepared to show the defendant meets the statutory criteria.”); Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(notice deficiency does not render a sentence “illegal” for the purposes of a rule 3.800 petition; claim should have been raised via 3.850 and is now time barred).