903 So. 2d 314 - Charles v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · State v. Schopp · 500 So. 2d 125 - Smith v. State · 640 So. 2d 106 - Brown v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the reviewing court finds that there is a reasonable possibility that the discovery violation prejudiced the defense or if the record is insufficient to determine that the defense was not materially affected, the error must be considered harmful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a proper Richardson inquiry by the trial court would have permitted such a lack of prejudice to be determined. However, without such an inquiry, the record does not support a finding of harmless error with the degree of certainty required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[O]nly if the appellate court can determine beyond a reasonable doubt that the defense was not procedurally prejudiced by the discovery violation can the error be considered harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.