Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 903 SO2D 644 - State v. Daniel

State v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · 450 So. 2d 933 - Title Research Corp. v. Rausch · 881 So. 2d 104 - State v. EXPUNGED RECORD NO. 249,044 · State v. Savoie · 507 So. 2d 9 - Ledford v. Pipes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After a contradictory hearing with the district attorney and the arresting law enforcement agency, the court may order ex-pungement of the record of a felony conviction dismissed pursuant to Article 893 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Upon the entry of such an order of expungement, all rights which were lost or suspended by virtue of the conviction shall be restored to the person against whom the conviction has been entered, and such person shall be treated in all respects as not having been arrested or convicted unless otherwise provided in this Section or otherwise provided in the Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 893 and 894.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “No court shall order the expungement or destruction of any record of the arrest and prosecution of any person convicted of a sex offense as defined by R.S. 15:541(14.1), 6 involving a child under the age of seventeen years. The provisions of this Paragraph shall apply to all records of any proceedings, order, judgment, or other action under Code of Criminal Procedure Article 893. (Footnote added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.