903 So. 2d 691 - Brooks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Neil v. Biggers · Gilbert v. California · Moore v. Illinois · Aetna Ins Co Kennedy Bogash Springfield Fire Marine Ins Co v. Same Liverpool & London & Globe Ins Co Limited
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“indulge every presumption against the waiver of a constitutional right,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he State is therefore not entitled to an opportunity to show that that testimony had an independent source. Only a per se exclusionary rule as to such testimony can be an effective sanction to assure that law enforcement authorities will respect the accused's constitutional right to the presence of his counsel at the critical lineup.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“there is grave potential for prejudice, intentional or not, in the pretrial lineup, which may not be capable of reconstruction at trial and . . . presence of counsel itself can often avert prejudice and assure a meaningful confrontation at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.