Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 903 SO2D 745 - Luvene v. Waldrup

Luvene v. Waldrup’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · 522 So. 2d 195 - Fruchter v. Lynch Oil Co. · 687 So. 2d 1205 - Wilbourn v. Stennett, Wilkinson & Ward · Triggs v. State · 186 So. 2d 756 - Thompson v. Erving's Hatcheries, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he non-moving party's claim must be supported by more than a mere scintilla of colorable evidence; it must be evidence upon which a fair-minded jury could return a favorable verdict.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleadings, but his response . . . must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the plaintiff must show that, but for their attorney's negligence, he would have been successful in the prosecution or defense of the underlying action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.