Bell v. Wolff’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1999
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Roedel v. Roedel · State Ex Rel. Willens v. Gray · State Ex Rel. Vicker's, Inc. v. Teel · Estate of Knapp ex rel. Igoe v. Newhouse · Herrin v. Straus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While apparently the court clerk did not send Plaintiff notice of the [judgment,] Defendants’ attorney did and it was received by Plaintiff ... at a time when the trial court still retained jurisdiction over the matter for fifteen days. Any failure of the court clerk in mailing the [judgment] to Plaintiff does not automatically affect its validity.... Plaintiff has not established prejudice. Furthermore, even if Rule 74.03 were the applicable rule, Plaintiff has not shown good reason or excuse nor good cause to have the [judgment] set aside.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nandan v. Drummond
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.