Replogle v. Replogle’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably Crews v. Crews (1997), Flathers v. Flathers (1997)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Fastnacht v. Fastnacht · Sinclair v. Sinclair · In Re the Marriage of Newberry · Ludlow v. Ahrens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) The interaction and interrelationship of the child with his parents, his siblings, and any other person who may significantly affect the child’s best interests; (4) The child’s adjustment to his home, school, and community.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Kennedy v. Kennedy · Ljb v. Lwb“1. In a proceeding for dissolution of the marriage ... the court shall set apart to each spouse his nonmarital property and shall divide the marital property in such proportions as the court deems just after considering all relevant factors including: (1) The economic circumstances of each spouse at the time the division of property is to become effective, including the desirability of awarding the family home or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the spouse having custody of any children; (2) The contribution of each spouse to the acquisition of the marital property, including the contribution of a spouse as homemaker; (3) The value of the nonmarital property set apart to each spouse; (4) The conduct of the parties during the marriage; and (5) Custodial arrangements for minor children.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hosack v. Hosack“The parties to a cause of action heard by a commissioner are entitled to file with the court a motion for a hearing by a judge of the family court....” Id. 3 . We note that “[a]bsent unusual circumstances, siblings should not be separated upon divorce.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tracy v. Tracy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.