Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 904 A2D 295 - Charbonneau v. State

Charbonneau v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williamson v. United States · United States v. Turkish · United States v. Salerno · Thompson v. Calderon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Notwithstanding any law or court rule to the contrary, the dissemination to the defendant or defense attorney in a criminal case of criminal history record information pertaining to any juror in such case is prohibited”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. STATE VS. DIST. CT. (OJEDA (FRANCISCO)) · State v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of State
  2. “as may be necessary to investigate misconduct by any juror.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. STATE VS. DIST. CT. (OJEDA (FRANCISCO)) · State v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of State
  3. “cannot have access, then neither should the State”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. STATE VS. DIST. CT. (OJEDA (FRANCISCO)) · State v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.