Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 904 F.2d 1179 - Patterson v. Crabb

Patterson v. Crabb’s Empirical Analysis

904 F.2d 1179 · 1990

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably Moran v. E.k. McDaniel (1996), Sargent v. Columbia Forest Products, Inc. (1996)

20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1701990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lorenzen v. Employees Retirement Plan of the Sperry & Hutchinson Co. · United States v. Torres · Zipfel v. Halliburton Co. · Patterson v. Portch · American Iron & Steel Institute v. Environmental Protection Agency

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he assertion of this power fills a gap in the appellate rules and is well within the traditional authority of the courts, properly described as inherent, to regulate procedures in them in the absence of legislatively prescribed rules.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “have asserted the power . . . to recall a mandate, in effect reopening the case, without limit of time, although only in exceptional circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In fact, there was such an order; we had overlooked it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.