United States v. Bejasa’s Empirical Analysis
904 F.2d 137 · 1990
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably United States v. Salameh (1998), In Re United States Of America, Petitioner. United States Of America (2001)
17 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission · Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The vital question is not whether the trial judge's conduct left something to be desired but 'whether his behavior was so prejudicial that it denied ... appellant[ ] a fair, as distinguished from a perfect, trial.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Yet, analysis of such comments, taken out of context of the entire record, is not the proper basis for review. Rather, we must make”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]e must make an examination of the entire record ... in order to determine whether the defendant received a fair trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.