Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 904 F.2d 394 - Abel v. Miller

Abel v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

904 F.2d 394 · 1990

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 2016
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2016

7 federal appellate ·

130199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Mitchell v. Forsyth · Rakovich v. Wade · Malhotra v. Cotter & Co. · Kennedy v. City of Cleveland · Apostol v. Gallion

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “would give defendants potent weapons for delay”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.