Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 904 F.2d 407 - Gunderson v. Schlueter

Gunderson v. Schlueter’s Empirical Analysis

904 F.2d 407 · 1990

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
4
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably Gordon v. Hansen (1999), Sanders v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (1993)

26 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions

3501990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Graham v. Connor · Paul v. Davis · Baker v. McCollan · Rochin v. People of California · United States v. Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “). Garcia correctly points out that the eighth circuit in Gunderson recognized that outrageous conduct by law enforcement authorities that”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[f]inding a due process violation here would bring us too close to converting every successful entrapment defense into a section 1983 action for damages.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[granting that a person is predisposed to commit an offense, we think that it may safely be said that investigative officers and agents may go a long way in concert with the individual in question without being deemed to have acted so outrageously as to violate due process....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.