Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 904 F.2d 882 - Peterson v. Murray

Peterson v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis

904 F.2d 882 · 1990

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
November 1998
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Lockett v. Ohio · Sandstrom v. Montana · Caldwell v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e believe that Ramos left to the states the decision concerning what, if anything, a jury should be told about commutation, pardon, and parole.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[S]tates are free to structure and shape consideration of mitigating evidence.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “You may infer malice from the deliberate use of a deadly weapon unless, from all the evidence, you have a reasonable doubt as to whether malice existed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.