Khalid v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
904 F.3d 129 · 2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2339A (§ 120005 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 5033 · 18 U.S.C. § 5034 · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1431 (§ 320 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1432 (§ 321 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · Reno v. Flores · Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice · Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Family law ... is an area of law that federal courts and Congress leave almost exclusively to state law and state courts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Khrapko v. Splain
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.