State v. Jonas’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Wainwright v. Witt · Swain v. State of Alabama · Smith v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where a judge improperly denies a challenge for cause but the defendant does not specifically ask for an additional peremptory challenge of a particular juror after exhausting his peremptory challenges,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[W]e examine jury instructions for reversible legal error by considering the instructions as a whole, and 'if some part was given improperly, the error is cured if the other instructions properly advise the jury as to the legal principles involved.' " (citation omitted) ). We find no error. III. Motion to Strike Juror. Finally, Barnhardt contends the trial court erred in denying his challenge to a potential juror for cause. Specifically, he argues the court erred in denying his challenge for cause under Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 2.18(5)(k), which allows a defendant to challenge for cause a potential juror who has "formed or expressed such an opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant as would prevent the juror from rendering a true verdict upon the evidence submitted on the trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“to disqualify a potential juror under Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 2.18(5)(k) and thereby causes a defendant to expend a peremptory challenge under rule 2.18(9), the defendant must specifically ask the court for an additional strike of a particular juror after his peremptory challenges have been exhausted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.