Phillips v. Hatfield’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2015
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Koulis v. Standard Oil Co. of California · Uckerman v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. · Pasker, Gould, Ames & Weaver, Inc. v. Morse · Nupetco Associates v. Jenkins · First Security Bank of Utah v. Creech
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, because we find Hatfield's appellate brief wholly fails to comply with Rule 24 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, and it inadequately presents the issue for our consideration, we decline to address his substantive argument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. MacKay v. Hardy“Moreover, this court will not consider any facts not properly cited to, or supported by, the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.