Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 904 So. 2d 116 - Hersick v. State

904 So. 2d 116 - Hersick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

34 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barker v. Wingo · Berger v. United States · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 666 So. 2d 767 - Cole v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] motion in limine should be granted only when the trial court finds two factors are present (1) the material or evidence in question will be inadmissible at a trial under the rules of evidence; and (2) the mere offer, reference, or statements made during trial concerning the material will tend to prejudice the jury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The burden is on the State to provide a defendant with a speedy trial. Therefore, the State bears the concomitant burden of showing that either the delay was caused by the defendant or that the delay was for a good cause. Where the State is unable to do either, this factor must be weighed against the State.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[u]nless good cause be shown, ... all offenses for which indictments are presented to the court shall be tried no later than two hundred seventy days (270) after the accused has been arraigned.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.