904 So. 2d 384 - Acker v. Acker’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · Krafick v. Krafick · 491 So. 2d 265 - Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer · 177 N.J. Super. 471 - Kikkert v. Kikkert · 601 So. 2d 534 - Pimm v. Pimm
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(d) The financial resources of each party, the nonmarital and the marital assets and liabilities distributed to each. . . . (g) All sources of income available to either party.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[a]ll vested and nonvested benefits, rights, and funds accrued during the marriage in retirement, pension, profit-sharing, annuity, deferred compensation, and insurance plans and programs”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[A] spouse's entitlement to pension or retirement benefits must be considered a marital asset for purposes of equitably distributing marital property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.