Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

904 So. 2d 573

Townsend v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-06-13

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2009

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-06-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant’s request for a belated appeal is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. The request does not constitute one of the enumerated grounds for filing a rule 3.850 motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(a). Thus, the trial court correctly denied the appellant’s motion.

¶2Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s rule 3.850 motion. This disposition is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a Petition for Belated Appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

¶3AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, DAVIS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
/904/so2d/573 · .json · Public domain