Rojas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · State v. Schopp · 819 So. 2d 705 - Cox v. State · State v. Coney · Rutherford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a defendant claims that the State has violated the rules of discovery, the trial court must first determine whether there was a discovery violation. If a violation has occurred, then the court must determine whether the violation was willful or inadvertent, if the violation was trivial or substantial, and whether it “resulted in prejudice or harm to the defendant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.