Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[Cjourts. should look to whether there was a separation of time, place, or circumstances between the initial armed robbery and the subsequent, grand theft, as those factors are objective criteria utilized to determine whether there are distinct and independent criminal acts or whether there is one continuous criminal act with a single criminal intent.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Tyrone Randy Johnson, Jr. v. State of Florida

2. “maintain[ed] that because sufficient evidence was presented at trial to establish that the theft of the vehicle and the theft of the contents occurred at different times, both convictions were lawful.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 907 So. 2d 640 - Gorday v. State

3. “separate crime occurs only when there are separate distinct acts of seizing the property of another.... Had the gun been picked up separately from the taking of the handbag,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 907 So. 2d 640 - Gorday v. State