Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

904 So. 2d 786

904 So.2d 786

2004 La.App.4Cir. 1906

State v. Kirkling

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 2005

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 2005-05-18

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2019

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-05-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

McKAY, J.,

¶1dissenting.

¶2I respectfully dissent in part from the majority opinion. I would affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences. I agree that there may have been some confusion in the trial court’s initial sentencing on October 15, 2003, as to count 1 wherein the trial court sentenced the defendant to serve twenty years on an attempted carjacking, when the maximum sentence was only ten years. However, the trial court cured this matter on October 21, 2004, at the multiple bill sentencing, by vacating the initial sentencing and resentencing the defendant to serve twenty years as a second offender. Therefore, I would not remand the matter to the district court for resentencing, but would affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences.

/904/so2d/786 · .json · Public domain