Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 904 SW2D 161 - Minns v. Piotrowski

Minns v. Piotrowski’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Transportation Insurance Co. v. Moriel · TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell · Stoner v. Thompson · Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert Blackmon · Landon v. Jean-Paul Budinger, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Cross-examination is a safeguard essential to a fair trial and a cornerstone in the quest for truth. Longstanding principles of our jurisprudence recognize the right and necessity of full and complete cross-examination.... The right to cross-examine a witness is a substantial one, and it is error to so restrict it as to prevent the cross-examining party from going fully into all matters connected with the examination in chief....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[e]vidence which is not relevant is inadmissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “any matter relevant to any issue in the case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.