Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 905 F.2d 1296 - United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

905 F.2d 1296 · 1990

Citation profile

241
cited by 241 later decisions
2
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

162 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 241 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably United States v. Flores-Payon (1991), United States v. Chapnick (1992)

162 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

2270199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742

Relies on Leary v. United States · Tot v. United States · United States v. Romano · King v. Lynaugh · McLaughlin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 241 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[T]he sentencing judge is in a unique position to evaluate the defendant's acceptance of responsibility,' and therefore her determination 'is entitled to great deference on review. We will not disturb the district court's determination unless it is without foundation.'”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if (1) there are 'exceptional circumstances' why the issue was not raised in the trial court, (2) the new issue arises while the appeal is pending because of a change in the law, or (3) the issue presented is purely one of law and the opposing party will suffer no prejudice as a result of the failure to raise the issue in the trial court.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is well settled that '[a] party must raise an objection initially to the trial court to preserve it for appeal.'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.