Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 905 F.2d 1383 - Gulley v. Orr

Gulley v. Orr’s Empirical Analysis

905 F.2d 1383 · 1990

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
September 2014
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 14 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably Hicks v. Gates Rubber Co. (1991), Dill v. City of Edmond (1998)

15 federal appellate · 14 district ·

250199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Brown v. General Services Administration · In re Disbarment of Sacco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In light of the distinct administrative mechanism created specifically to address class claims of discrimination, the weight of authority addressing this issue has held that exhaustion of individual administrative remedies is insufficient to commence a class action in federal court; rather, one of the named plaintiffs must have exhausted class administrative remedies.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “mechanism ... through which an individual could assert class claims in the context of his own individual discrimination claims”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.