Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 905 F.2d 1413 - Transpower Constructors Division of Harrison International Corporation v. Grand River Dam Authority

Transpower Constructors Division of Harrison International Corporation v. Grand River Dam Authority’s Empirical Analysis

905 F.2d 1413 · 1990

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
5
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 3 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Mason v. Texaco, Inc. (1991), Foley v. City of Lowell (1991)

33 federal appellate · 3 district · 13 state decisions

460199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Hanna v. Plumer · Dallas County Commissioners Court v. Richardson · E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Sindell · Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]nterest shall be allowed on any money judgment in a civil case recovered in a district court.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the parties must express their intent to exculpate in unequivocally clear language; (2) the agreement must result from an arm's length transaction between parties of equal bargaining power; and (3) the exculpation must not violate public policy.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the evidence taken in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom point but one way, in favor of the moving party.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.