Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

905 F.2d 1528

Docket No. 89-1831.

Boyer v. Te Campbell Dm E E

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted May 7, 1990. Decided May 16, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied June 25, 1990.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 1996 · most notably Cochran v. Morris (1996), Cathedral Quartet, Huntsinger v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (1990)

25 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, District Judge. (C/A No. 87-1637-2-8)

Jesse E. Boyer, Sr., appellant pro se.

James Albert Stuckey, Jr., Stuckey & Kobrovsky, Charleston, S.C., for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Jesse E. Boyer, Sr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boyer v. Campbell, CA-87-1637-2-8 (D.S.C. Oct. 18, 1989). Appellant's motions relating to the handling and content of particular tapes and transcripts are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/905/f2d/1528 · .json · Public domain