Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

905 F.2d 1529

Docket No. 89-2765.

Joseph Anthony Fausto v. John O. Marsh, Jr.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Dec. 21, 1989. Decided May 21, 1990.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-05-21

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Fulton v. Brown

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-05-21

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 89-99-A)

Joseph Anthony Fausto, appellant pro se.

Paula Pugh Newett, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Joseph Anthony Fausto appeals from the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination suit brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-16(c). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fausto v. Marsh, C/A No. 89-99-A (E.D.Va. July 14, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/905/f2d/1529 · .json · Public domain