Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

905 F.2d 1530

Docket No. 90-8010.

In Re Patrick C. Lynn

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted May 7, 1990. Decided May 21, 1990. Rehearing Denied June 14, 1990.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-06-14

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In re Beard · Bruce Miller v. Ge Government Services, Ge Company

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-06-14

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Patrick C. Lynn, petitioner pro se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Patrick C. Lynn, a South Carolina prisoner, brought this mandamus petition seeking an order directing the district court to allow his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint to be filed. In the complaint, Lynn alleged that South Carolina prison officials had not complied with the terms of a settlement agreement entered into in several previous 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 actions, and that he had been subjected to retaliation as a result of those actions. The district court construed the complaint as a motion to enforce the settlement agreement and directed Lynn's attorney from the settled case to consult with Lynn and file a motion to enforce the settlement agreement if appropriate.

¶2

The district court properly construed the complaint as a motion to enforce the settlement agreement, and Lynn's claims can be addressed in proceedings regarding the motion. Therefore, there is another remedy by which Lynn can obtain the requested relief, and mandamus relief is not appropriate. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly aid in the decisional process.

¶3

PETITION DENIED.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

/905/f2d/1530 · .json · Public domain