101 Ranch v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
905 F.2d 180 · 1990
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2025
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2409A · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Carnegie v. United States · Oregon State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand and Gravel Company Corvallis Sand and Gravel Company · Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co. · Bonelli Cattle Co. v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“lying below the meander line in the Devils Lake-Stump Lake chain of lakes,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“zones on a navigable waterway which the law does not permit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Oberly v. Carpenter, 67 N.D. 495 , 274 N.W. 509, 513 (1936).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.