Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 905 F.2d 214 - Williams v. Sullivan

Williams v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

905 F.2d 214 · 1990

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
September 2015
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Colvin v. Derwinski (1991), Browning v. Sullivan (1992)

12 federal appellate · 7 district ·

320199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gamer v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Basinger v. Heckler · Cristobal SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee · Russell v. Bowen · Haywood v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Medical evidence obtained after an ALJ decision is material if it relates to the claimant's condition on or before the date of the ALJ's decision.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If new and material evidence is submitted, the Appeals Council ... shall evaluate the entire record including the new and material evidence submitted if it relates to the period on or before the date of the administrative law judge hearing decision. It will then review the case if it finds that the administrative law judge’s action, findings, or conclusion is contrary to the weight of the evidence currently of record.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “if the additional evidence is (a) new, (b) material, and (c) relates to the period on or before the date of the ALJ's decision.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.