Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 905 F.2d 259 - Miller v. Hambrick

Miller v. Hambrick’s Empirical Analysis

905 F.2d 259 · 1990

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft (2004), Phillips v. Seiter (1999)

37 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

3801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 31 U.S.C. § 5316

Relies on Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman · Ahrens v. Clark · Dunne v. Henman · United States ex rel. Quinn v. Hunter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Normally transfer will be in the interest of justice because normally dismissal of an action that could be brought elsewhere is 'time-consuming and justice-defeating.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in which the action could have been brought 'if it is in the interest of justice.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]henever a civil action is filed in a court as defined in section 610 of this title or an appeal, including a petition for review of administrative action, is noticed for or filed with such a court and that court finds that there is a want of jurisdiction, the court shall, if it is in the interest of justice, transfer such action or appeal to any other such court in which the action or appeal could have been brought at the time it was filed or noticed, and the action or appeal shall proceed as if it had been filed in or noticed for the court to which it is transferred on the date upon which it was actually filed in or noticed for the court from which it is transferred.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.