Daubert v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
905 F.2d 266 · 1990
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Schweiker v. Hansen · American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp. · Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Gibbons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the meaning of the words used is in doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Owino v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.