Caesar Electronics Inc. v. Andrews’s Empirical Analysis
905 F.2d 287 · 1990
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2021
8 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · United Families of America v. Kendrick · United Transportation Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority · United Families of America v. Kendrick · International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Local 37 v. Boyd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“under the Erie doctrine, federal law governs the procedural aspects of summary judgment in a diversity case”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.