Barry v. Freshour’s Empirical Analysis
905 F.3d 912 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · Alderman v. United States · Rawlings v. Kentucky · Smith v. Maryland · Minnesota, v. Wayne Thomas Carter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] claimant alleging a Fourth Amendment violation must have a cognizable Fourth Amendment interest-a concept known as Fourth Amendment standing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a justifiable, a reasonable, or a legitimate expectation of privacy that has been invaded by government action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.