Jackson v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2025
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co. · Hendrick v. Walters · Draper v. State · Leatherock v. Lawter · Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“such intermediate appellate courts as may be provided by statute”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) provide intermediate appellate courts; (2) create or provide for the exercise of adjudicative authority by boards, agencies, or commissions in individual proceedings; (8) change or abolish the Court of Criminal Appeals, the State Industrial Court, the Court of Bank Review and the Court of Tax Review and such Boards, Agencies and Commissions as have been established by statute; and (4) create, change, or abolish municipal courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“OKLA. CONST. art. IV, § 1. At one time the Oklahoma Constitution gave to the Legislature the express power to create courts:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.