Bristow v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
4
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hunnicutt v. State · 189 Wis. 2d 105 - State v. Richter · 438 So. 2d 127 - McGee v. State · 40 Ill. App. 3d 344 - People v. Albarran · James v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 11 is the statutory prohibition on multiple punishment, which is violated where a single criminal act gives rise to offenses which are (1) not separate and distinct, (2) a mere means to some other ultimate objective, (3) lesser included offenses, or (4) merely different incidents or facets of some primary offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Murray
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.