Totemoff v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2024 · most notably Hall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole (2004), Leisnoi, Inc. v. United States (1999)
2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 3101 (Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act) · 16 U.S.C. § 3102 · 16 U.S.C. § 3111 · 16 U.S.C. § 3112 · 16 U.S.C. § 3114 · 16 U.S.C. § 3115 · 16 U.S.C. § 3121 · 16 U.S.C. § 3124
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The term "land" means lands, waters, and interests therein. (2) The term "Federal land" means lands the title to which is in the United States after December 2, 1980. (3) The term "public lands" means land situated in Alaska which, after December 2, 1980, are Federal lands, except (A) land selections of the State of Alaska which have been tentatively approved or validly selected under the Alaska Statehood Act and lands which have been confirmed to, validly selected by, or granted to the Territory of Alaska or the State under any other provision of Federal law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. James v. State · James v. State“Federal law can preempt state law in three ways. First, Congress may expressly declare that state law is preempted. Second, state law is preempted if Congress intends the federal government to occupy a field exclusively. Third, federal law preempts state law if the two actually conflict. See, e.g., Wisconsin Pub. Intervenor v. Mortier, 501 U.S. 597, 604-05 , 111 S.Ct. 2476, 2481-82 , 115 L.Ed.2d 532 (1991); English v. General Elec. Co., 496 U.S. 72„ 78-79, 110 S.Ct. 2270, 2274-75 , 110 L.Ed.2d 65 (1990).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]his court is not bound by decisions of federal courts other than the United States Supreme Court on questions of federal law”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.