Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 905 SO2D 1016 - Ortiz v. State

Ortiz v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Rich v. State · 858 So. 2d 1103 - Fair v. Crosby · Standard Jury Inst.-Civil Cases (No. 02-2) · 891 So. 2d 569 - York v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] determination as to whether the justifiable use of deadly force instruction constituted fundamental error requires a full review of the record on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[F]ailure of appellate counsel to argue that the jury instruction on justifiable use of force constituted fundamental error was ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]s attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of a forcible felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.