Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 905 SO2D 1039 - Sage v. State

Sage v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Florida v. Nixon · Nelson v. State · 758 So. 2d 618 - Nixon v. Singletary · 884 So. 2d 279 - White v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not, however, want postconviction relief to be denied simply because of a pleading defect if that pleading defect could be remedied by a good faith amendment to the motion. Therefore, when a defendant fails to allege that a witness would have been available, the defendant should be granted leave to amend the motion within a specified time period. If no amendment is filed within the time allowed, then the denial can be with prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he defendant must show that counsel's concession strategy was 'unreasonable.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.