Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 905 SO2D 169 - Dickenson v. Aultman

Dickenson v. Aultman’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry · 767 So. 2d 1235 - Pearson v. Moore · Schultz v. Schickedanz · Cole v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We share in the frustrations of the Department. There is no doubt that the sentencing judge failed to impose the criminal penalty mandated by section 316.193(2)(a)(3) [sic] and that the State Attorney's office failed to take any action to have this error corrected. This sentencing error, however, cannot be remedied by allowing the Department to impose a criminal penalty that the legislature has not expressly authorized the Department to impose."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “court ... shall order placement of an ignition interlock device in those circumstances required by s. 316.193.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.