Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 905 SO2D 172 - State v. Clifton

State v. Clifton’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 563 So. 2d 622 - Joint Ventures, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp. · Jones v. State · 509 So. 2d 1115 - Ochoa v. State · State v. Agee · State v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]lthough the state may amend an information after the speedy trial time expires, the state may not ... then amend[] an existing information in such a way that results in the levying of new charges (if those new charges arise from the same facts and circumstances giving rise to the original charge).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he State may not circumvent the purpose and intent of the speedy trial rule by: 1) entering a nolle prosequi of the charges and waiting to refile them until after the speedy trial period has expired; 2) voluntarily dismissing the charges before they are formally filed and filing formal charges after the time limit has expired; or 3) taking no action after the defendant is arrested and waiting until after the speedy trial period has expired to file formal charges. In these instances, the state has essentially abandoned the prosecution and the recapture provisions of the rule do not apply, with.the result that the defendant must be discharged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(o) Nolle Prosequi; Effect. The intent and effect of this rule shall not be avoided by the state by entering a nolle prosequi to a crime charged and by prosecuting a new crime grounded on the same conduct or criminal episode or otherwise by prosecuting new and different charges based on the same conduct or criminal episode, whether or not the pending charge is suspended, continued, or is the subject of entry of a nolle prosequi.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.