Dewberry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Griffith v. United States · Suwannee Swifty Stores, Inc. v. Georgia Lottery Corp. · Drye v. United States · Solventes Y Quimica de Nicaragua, S.A. Solquimisa v. Weaver · Target Corp. v. Hollister
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, a valid stop ... does not necessarily validate a subsequent pat-down search of the occupants for weapons. The Florida Stop and Frisk Law allows an officer, who has validly stopped an individual, to search the individual only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the individual is armed with a dangerous weapon and poses a threat to the officer or any other person.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“must consider the totality of the circumstances as viewed by an experienced police officer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.