Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 905 SW2D 510 - Fields v. Commonwealth

Fields v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tome v. United States · Eubank v. Commonwealth · United States v. Tome · United States v. Montague · Bussey v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Admissions of parties. A statement is not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness, if the statement is offered against a party and is: [[Image here]] (4) A statement by the party’s agent or servant concerning a matter within the scope of the agency or employment, made during the existence of the relationship; or”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.