Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 906 A.2d 139 - Baker v. State

Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Czech v. State (2008), Wright v. State (2009)

30 state decisions

180200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. United States · Maryland v. Craig · Wainwright v. State · United States v. Sherman · Getz v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “apparent on the face of the record, which are”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If defense counsel raised a timely and pertinent objection to prosecutorial misconduct at trial, or if the trial judge intervened and considered the issue sua sponte , we essentially review for harmless error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “so as to imply clearly that he had a factual basis to conclude that the defendant had some involvement with sex offenses before he committed the ones for which he was on trial,” was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.